Friday , August 23 2019
Home / sweden / Linus Larsson: Apple shouts at a paid-in hearing on Facebook

Linus Larsson: Apple shouts at a paid-in hearing on Facebook

They are almost neighbors in the Silicon Valley, Facebook headquarters in Menlo Park and Apple a bit south of Cupertino.

But it doesn't seem to help.

Apple is currently accusing Facebook of a violation of the rules, after Facebook discovered that teens are paying for teens because they had rented themselves, and Apple banned Facebook from releasing some applications directly through the Apple platform.

We take it from the beginning. Facebook has been struggling for many years to learn more about what users are using on their mobile phones than usual. Due to the lack of better words, the methods of success are questionable. Already in 2014, Facebook purchased Onavo, a technology company that would help people save their data consumption on a mobile subscription, while at the same time allowing tracking of traffic and understanding of other applications.

It should be for Facebook to discover that Whatsapp's news service grew so fast, which led Mark Zuckerberg to buy Whatsapp for $ 19 billion, according to Techcrunch.

But Apple got an eye on Onavo, said it had violated the app store guidelines and made Facebook delete it.

Do you mean Facebook so when you've mastered the training, you've been wrong. Instead, Facebook uses the trick to fly under the radar. The new Facebook Research app was released, but not in the App Store, where anyone can get it.

No, Facebook turned directly to individuals and offered them money to install by tapping an app that could only be accessed separately. For $ 20 a month, users over the age of 13 will receive their traffic and analyze them on Facebook. An application would have such a deep right that even encrypted traffic can be read.

Here it gets tough. Thus, the application in question was not disclosed openly but with a specific channel for use within the company for internal use. If, for example, DN would be an application only for its own journalists, then they can be released in this way. It is also used to test applications that are not ready for a wide audience.

But Facebook used it as a discreet way to get an app that they reasonably understood would be contradictory. This week, the site posted a great deal on Techcrunch
published article about method.

Then Apple replied. Facebook was, Apple stuck, breaking the rules, distributing the app this way. That's why Facebook was forbidden to use the system for internal applications – completely. in accordance with
The Verge programs came to an end to work for the company's employees.

This is a real problem and should be familiar with Facebook. Not to mention the impact as a warning shot – even breathe in the difficulty of having the app in the Apple store causing the ground to shake on someone like Facebook.

Why does Apple do it? Apple isn't a saint, but it's a very different company than Google and Facebook. The latter live in advertising. Advertising requires information. Detailed profiles of people, their lives and taste. Apple mainly earns money for hardware – mobile phones and computers – and can use higher privacy charges.

Today, much is said about the ability of institutions to regulate Facebook. But the question is, can anyone affect more energy than a company like Apple.

Read also: Five questions about the technology world in 2019

Source link