Monday , March 8 2021

Action against plastics is action against consumption



Scientists and environmentalists did not mean that people would turn to plastic

Plastic, plastic, plastic ...

Plastic, plastic, plastic …
© Pixabay

Plastics are everywhere, and now we have decided that this is a very bad thing. It is surprising to many that about 50 percent of the materials from which cars and aircraft are produced is about 50 percent. More clothing is made of nylon and polyester, which is plastic, such as cotton or wool. Plastic is associated with the removal of adhesive teaspoon. Plastics are toys, bottoms that are used in household packaging. We live in a plastic, colorful, and everyday contemporary material empire, writes Stefan Burani Guardian.

Every year in the world we make 340 million tons of plastic, which means it can fill all of New York's skyscrapers. For decades, man has caused an inexplicable amount of plastic. The amount of 100 tons was exceeded in the nineties. According to the National Statistical Office, in Slovenia, in 2016, 59,000 tons of plastic waste was produced, which is 19 percent less than in 2015. Of these, 5 percent or 3000 tons were produced by households.

Plastic waste has only just begun to be alarmed by people, and we are witnessing a rebellion process of a global dimension. It crosses borders and political differences. Julian Kirby, the organization for protecting Earth Friends, says he has not seen anything like that for nearly twenty years as an activist. With scenes of protests against plastics, people forced those who were able to handle.

Every year in the world we make 340 million tons of plastic, which means it can fill all of New York's skyscrapers.

This is promising, written by Stephen Buranyi, but more plastic cardboards should be made in carton boxes. Plastic is not everywhere, because it is better than the natural materials that replaced it, but because it is cheaper and lighter. It's so much cheaper than evaporating trash. It's convenient for consumers and companies are happy to sell plastic packaging for every product they buy. Plastics have allowed modern consumer culture to rely on low prices and disposable products. Consequently, action against plastics is in fact a consumption-oriented behavior.

It's interesting how fast the flow moves to plastic. Even in 2015, there was no mass protest against plastics, although we did not know about it more than today. Plastics only had one of the problems, such as climate change, endangered animal species, antibiotic resistance to bacteria only three years ago, although researchers at the beginning of the 1990s found that 50 to 80 percent of the waste in the oceans had unbreakable plastics but increased plasticity which pours into rivers and sea.

In 2004, Plymouth Richard Thompson, an ocean expert, came up with the term "microplastic". Researchers around the world began to investigate how microplastics penetrates into animal organs and kills large fish like tuna. In Georgia, Jenna Jambeck, an environmental expert at the University of Georgia, with her team of researchers, estimated every year that 4.8 to 12.7 million tonnes of plastic waste were landed in the ocean and that this amount would double by 2025. In the past, the media here and there published a story about plastic waste, overflow landfills and waste exports. But there is not much interest in this topic today. Roland Geyer, an influential environmentalist at the University of California, notes that between 2006 and 2016, journalists have asked for less than ten interviews, with more than two hundred in the last two years.

This is the consequence of thinking changes caused by the addition of microparticles from plastic to cosmetics and cleaning products. In 2010, scientists began to warn that these particles threatened life in the seas, and people were shocked to find that they are found in thousands of articles, including those that manufacturers make sure they are environmentally friendly. Later people learned that a huge amount of microplastic fiber was washed in water, even with each of the nylon and polyester cloths. When scientists began to show how these microfibers enter the fish intestines, newspapers began publishing articles with titles such as "Yoga Pants for Destruction on Earth". From tires containing 60% plastic, the environment has more micro-plaster surfaces than cosmetics, cleaning products and clothing when driving.

When scientists began to show how these microfibers enter the fish intestines, newspapers began publishing articles with titles such as "Yoga Pants for Destruction on Earth". From tires containing 60% plastic, the environment has more micro-plaster surfaces than cosmetics, cleaning products and clothing when driving.

Greenpeace, former Greenpeace director Chris Rose, who writes an influential blog on the environment, explains that scientists have long been warned that plastics are a dangerous pollutant. Scientists and environmentalists did not expect people to be against him anymore. Although we use it in everyday life, it would be difficult for most people to explain what it is, who it is producing and where it comes from, if they ask for it. This is understandable because plastics are a global industrial product that is far from a public point of view. Raw materials for its production are fossil fuels, and many oil and gas producers also produce plastics, often in the same factory. The plastic story is a story about the fossil fuel industry, as well as the expansion of the oil consumer culture after the Second World War.

During the decades of economic growth, after the Second World War, cotton, glass and cardboard replaced plastic consumer goods. Not only did she supplement this material, but also expanded consumption. "Our extremely productive economy requires consumption to be a way of life," writes economist Victor Lebov in 1955. Plastic was a profit. A researcher at the Midwest Research Institute in 1969 wrote that it was a powerful force to develop the market for refuse containers that the withdrawal of each bottle from the market meant selling 20 non-refundable amounts.

According to Stephen Burany, plastic is the microclimate of all our environmental problems. Given this logic, the solutions to these problems are the same. In just a few short years, people, on the basis of scientific evidence of plastic damage, organized pressure to force governments to adopt laws to regulate it, even if they were met in fossil fossil fuels.

Much more in the fight against climate change, the opposition to plastic can become a small but exhilarating victory, a model for future action.

Consumers nowadays demand less packaging in stores. On this basis, BP's oil company estimates that the oil industry will gain two million barrels of oil in 2040 less than today. We noticed that we were obsessed with plastics. Much more in the fight against climate change, the opposition to plastic can become a small but exhilarating victory, a model for future action.

This is an understanding of how the problems are interconnected. It is an opinion that plastics are not an isolated problem that we want to exclude from our lives, but only the most obvious product of our intolerable consumption over the past fifty years. Although the challenge is magnificent, oceanographer Richard Thompson, who invented the term microplastics, is optimistic. In the last 30 years, scientists, economics and governments have not agreed. So he sees real solutions.


Source link