Rob Jetten's anointing was meant to convince Senate. He "agrees with senators' concerns." Last month's House of Representatives D66, chairman of the Jetten, defended his initiative legislation in the Senate on Tuesday, bringing the constituents out of the constitution. And the constitutional changes that make the senate nervous.
The question was whether the coalition partner senators VVD (13 seats) and CDA (12 seats) would agree to the D66 plan next week – although both parties supported the House of Representatives. In addition to the SGP (2 places), which basically opposes, it is also foreseen that PvdA (8 seats) and the Independent Senate faction (1st place) will vote against. It now seems clear that the proposal will also be due to the proposed joint proposal by four Senate colleagues to ensure that the meter is given an independent position in the future.
To achieve this, Jetten had convinced the Senate with the promise that he himself "was not even the mayor of this heavy prime minister" who could send his deputy to his political program. He also agrees that the municipality must continue the city council. "This change in the Constitution does not change anything," said Jetten.
CDA Senator Ton Rombouts, very depressing at the start of the debate, was "pleasantly surprised." He acknowledged that the CDA had to turn in its turn: in 2015, the Senate Party, later in the opposition, was against a constitutional amendment. But now Rombouts dares to do this also because his coalition partners support his suggestion that, even if the appointment of a meter might change in the future, he should continue to be "independent and impartial" and "be a director of all citizens".
In both houses, a two-thirds majority is needed to free the city from the Constitution. Then it becomes possible to change something with the usual majority and the way the measure is assigned. Since the beginning of this century, candidates have the practice of writing application letters, after which municipalities nominate a candidate and the king officially nominates them.
Most parties are happy with it, but the question is about some parties, or the constitution also includes the appointment of the Kroon.
The long-term desire of D66 to pursue a more direct democracy, including the appointment of mayors, seemed to be fulfilled when the law of initiative reached the Rutte III coalition agreement in exchange for the removal of the consultative referendum.
At the beginning of the debate, Jetten received support from unusual friends: opposition senators. PVV Senator Alexander van Hattem called his proposal a "historic step". The "50Plus" celebrity Jan Jan Nagel also supported Jetten. "We support direct democracy and it's not hard to say it."
It was the mind of the Senator Hans-Engels of D66, who, of course, supports the Jettens constitutional amendment, but does not want to burn his hands on the question of whether it leads directly to elected measures. He did not want to "speed up" the discussion about it. He can still remember how the proposal of the 2005 D66 Minister, Thom de Graaf, was down, as the party wanted to change the constitution and make direct elections.
The main opponents
D66 Minister for the Interior, Mr Kaiss Ollongren, emphasized that, due to the constitutional amendment, "in principle, nothing changes in the current appointment method". She even called for a "unlikely" change. The government will not adopt such a plan: in the coalition, the only elected mayor is D66.
The Jettens political allies of the coalition kept a little tension. Senator Helmi Huijbregts said that there are opponents, even "a series of principals, between the NLDs." Within the framework of the group, we specifically refer to the President of Parliament, Ankie Brocker. "We can be formally against it, but the question is whether it can be moral," said a member of the NGO in the corridors. "This proposal has been exchanged for the abolition of the referendum, which is the crown jewel that is washing its minister." In addition, in 2005 and 2015, the VVD agreed to abolish the crown. Huijbregts also asked Ollongren's letter with his "vision of the responsibilities and authority of local government organizations and mayors". It will be held this week, and only then will the VVD carry out a "final assessment".
At the same time, the corridors were under heavy pressure. Also because the Animal Party (2 places) has announced it wants to roll-call votes. This means that all senators should vote in person, not in groups. If she finds it appropriate (see Rob Jetten, which can be given by the blue eye) – PvdD also plans to vote against the law, despite earlier support.
This would mean that there could still be 11 senators from the SFS and the CDA, without the proposal being shot.