Monday , March 8 2021

Decree in Genoa, most are defeated by Ischia Amnesty – Politics



Most were rejected by amending Article 25 of the Decree governing the amnesty practice in Ischia and being discussed in the Senate Committee. 25.12. The amendment requires the deletion of the part in respect of which the application for amnesty relates to provisions of Law No.47 of 28 February 1985. The amendment was approved.

An amendment to Article 25 of the Genoa Decree was tabled by Urania Papatheu, Senator of Forasa Italia, and approved by 23 votes to 22 and Senate M5 Paola Nugni's disapproval. Gregorio De Falco voted yes.

From highway concession to public works, from tax amnesty to ports. These are some of the issues raised in the amendments to the tax law tabled by the rapporteur on Emiliano Fenu (M5S), Senate Finance Committee.

Fiscal peace becomes external. Until 31 May 2019, taxpayers will be able to correct errors or omissions and integrate not only tax returns submitted by 31 October 2017 but also "later" notifications for the years 90, 2017, submitted in the next 90 days. This amendment includes an amendment to the tax decree submitted by the Senate Finance Committee to the rapporteur, Movimento 5 Stelle.

Patuanelli, a fee, but we will fix it – What happened at the Public Works Commission does not concern either the government or the majority that is and still is stable; this applies only to two people who have committed themselves to citizens: Gregorio De Falco and Paola Nugnes. The commission is moving forward and we will rectify this unpleasant distortion in Parliament, "Stefano Patuanelli, leader of the 5-star Senate, said.
"We will appreciate it in the next few days," Patuanelli responded to the hypothesis that the movement would act against the "dissident" senators Nugnes and De Falco, one abstained, and the other on an amnesty amendment that eliminated the majority of the majority of the government. After the amendment was approved, Mr Patuanelli, who is also one of the speakers of the Genoa Law, added: "There has been a very serious question: Genoese can not wait for the most important steps that we put in place and postpone the House, it may mean its decadence, given the timing of the approval."

Renzi, thanks to M5S, who voted against condono – "Today, in the committee, the government was defeated in a building amnesty, I want to say publicly, thanks to the M5S Senators who had the courage to vote against this waste." So PD Senator Matteo Renzi commented on the vote in the Senate Committee's Security Decree.

"The fight for our action without the amnesty of the surrounding area, which Di Maio wants Ischia, gives rise to the first results. A few minutes ago, the Senate commissions won the majority with an amendment to the amnesty. For the first time in this legislative process, thanks to voting for some Senators with five stars, the government held parliamentary work , and I thank that we will continue to fight the amnesty and legitimacy of the Parliament. I renew the appeal of Conte and Salvini: remove part of the amnesty by building the Jesuits with the Genoa Decree, and we will vote with you, but let's get rid of the dirty amnesties. If only an unaccompanied person dies, enough! "PD Matteo Renzi's Senator writes it on Facebook.

Bonelli, robbery eskija Good news "Good news comes from the Senate tonight, Ischia's amnesty is practically left out! I want to thank those who voted for this amendment, as well as those M5S senators who have not co-ordinated their leader, have protected the prerogatives conferred on him by the Constitution, that this territory is not divided and that the law is the same for everybody: honest Italians thank you. " Angelo Bonelli from Green declares it.

With amendments to FI more restrictions on amnesty in Ischia – With the approval of Forza Italia, as set out in Article 25 of the Genoa Decree, the amnesty procedures submitted by Ischia are still to be respected in 1985, but will take into account landscape constraints. To highlight, this is the FI's Senator Paolo Mallegni. "There are more stringent restrictions," he explains, "because of the ineligibility we needed, we did not object to the amnesty, but we wanted it to be better organized."


Source link