The Women's Hospital Crumlin has apologized to the couple for missing out on their care, including the issue of an incorrect genetic report.
The couple sued the hospital and the HSE for a nerve shock in processes that focused on genetic screening and chromosomal abnormalities involving two of their children.
Judge Kevin Krysl of the Supreme Court on Tuesday said that cases could be ruled out because of the confidential agreement reached.
Dr John O & # 39; Mahony SC, for a couple, read the apology letter from a couple of hospital executives, Sean Walsh.
"I want to repeat the apology contained in the review report of 4 August 2017 to you and your family about the events that took place in August 2010, when the incorrect genetic overview was issued to you and the dangers posed by it," she said. "The hospital without a reservation extends the real apology for the lack of care provided."
The woman was at the hospital at the National Medical Genetics Center. She was born in 2010 to a baby girl, who survived for 18 months and acquired several inherited pathologies.
The woman then gave birth to two sons without chromosomal anomalies, but another girl died one hour after her birth in 2014.
It was argued that only after the birth of the second girl came after the examination of the presence of a chromosomal state that led to a repeat of the couple appeared only after death.
The court found out that the couple was not aware of the risk of increased recurrence. It was further argued that in 2010 there was no adequate examination of pairs of chromosomes around the time of their first daughter's birth.
It was argued that a proper investigation procedure had been carried out at this stage if the risk of congenital pathology was identified for future pregnancies and that excessive risk should be reported too.
They further argued that due consideration was not given to appropriate investigations or chromosomal abnormalities associated with the birth of their two daughters.
The couple argued that they had a severe mental disorder, and after the death of their first daughter, it was not recommended to increase the risk of chromosomal pathology.
A breach of duty was recognized in relation to the genetic screening couple in 2010, but all other claims were rejected.