The National Framework has been updated, but outside it, and both students and teachers have too much of MTA studies.
Although the portal claims that the MTA study does not basically reflect the negative image of NAT, the academy studies a number of key issues in the framework program. According to experts, the project does not show a comprehensive picture of people, since it is not entirely clear what exactly is the framework program to be covered?
It should also be clarified what type of school NAT covers on an average level, helping a larger number of students to enter higher education.
According to the MTA experts, there is a positive trend that the number of study rooms has decreased compared with previous experience in teaching literature. However, the academy points out that it is not possible to achieve this by combining the fields of "science and geography" and "technology". However, there is also a summary of the academic academy: There are many contradictions in the design of science and mathematics, of which lessons are important. The problem that the Academy needs to solve is this
- The lower grades are not fully utilized from the point of view of scientific education.
- the recommended number of hours is very high, "34 hours is a limiting factor for life both for high school pupils and for those who are struggling with pupils"
- One lacks the learning of the world from nature, history and culture.
Academic experts have indicated that appropriate NAT can only be achieved by improving teacher training. They proposed that there should be a national curriculum for teacher and continuing education, as current teacher training does not reflect the content or methodology content described in the NAT project.
Not quite patriotic