Zac Efron as Bundy's "extremely wicked, shocking evil and vils" (left) and Netflix & # 39; talks with the killer & # 39; (to the right).
Almost 45 years after his first arrest, the social enthusiasm has seized Ted Bundy's crimes and refused to release. Bundy's crimes – he admitted to killing at least 30 women – are incredibly well documented and discussed; Every possible genre of stories has created a deep interest in Bundi. He was played by Mark Harmon actors in 1986 Deliberate stranger Cary Elwes inside Rivermans In 2004 and recently Zac Efron in the upcoming film Very wicked, shocking evil and vile. Bundy is mentioned in the songs of Eminem, Tyler, Creator and T.I; Jane's Addiction Song “Ted, Just Admit It” even offers an interview with Bundy in the 80s. In 1989, the Bundy was executed with an electric shock in Florida, Blondie Debbie Harry told the newspaper that she thought she once came with her – it was later demolished as very unlikely, but Harry continues to tell various magazines and newspapers in 2010. sending again Sun.
In a longread essay on the Trash Balance of True Crime, Soraya Roberts summarized four common explanations for why we love stories about crime: "The real crime can be a cathartic channel for our primary calls, a source of schadenfreude, a controlled environment to experience the passion of fear and the way to fear to attract us (especially women) with knowledge to keep themselves safe. “All these things can be true, but in an attempt to explain our anxiety about more and more crime stories, we are trying to come back to defense. We think we can never know enough about the murderers, so we pretend to be the right thing to continue telling about them, and these troubles complement each other while they inflate. In fact, we know everything we need to know about Bundi, and the stories we continue to tell about him puts the circle around the truth.
1978 New York Time made an article about the Bundi, known as the "American American Boy on the Court", in which the writer Jon Nordheimer, agonizing about the look of Kennedy-esque of Bundy, wondered how someone who seemed to be all could commit the crimes he did. Netflix has recently "tweeted" sent to people whose removal from the new documentary series Talking to the murderer: Ted Bundy Tapes was that Bundy was hot.
The Bundy benefited from his position as a white man throughout his life, even during his trial. He was obviously attractive but also mediocre to overcome the police's understanding several times. When he was finally caught, he was given special treatment in prison. He was given better food than other prisoners. Guards made it easy for him because of his "humor and brightness", allowing him to go to court without his foot irons, and the Bundy used his "fate" – these privileges as a white man – to escape briefly in June 1977 and again in December.
Even after his death, the Bundy benefits from the racist ideas that violence brings us. If color men – especially black men – are considered to be unequivocally violent, white men who commit the crime are often honored. Intended Teen Voguewriter Sandra Song pointed out that our attractiveness is the cultural heritage of the Bundi and other white male murderers canonizing; she noted that there was a risk that hot teen idols, such as Zac Efron and Ross Lynch, would be invented in the lives of serial killers. Bundy is known to have escaped his crimes with his obvious good appearance, but he remembered it because of the constant media narration that focuses his appearance on the centerpiece of his crimes.
Of course, the only media story that is more popular than the Hot Bundy is Enigmatic Bundy. We love the idea that we never know what motivated the Bundi to harm people in such a terrible degree. However, as stated by writer Zoé Samudzi TwitterMany of the killers we try to understand are killing for privileges and rights.
In her book Defending the DevilBundy's lawyer Polly Nelson wrote: "It was the absurd noise of his crimes that struck me … his obvious anger against women. He had no compassion … His killings were his life's achievements. “In 1978, psychiatric tests revealed that the Bundy had deep anger against women. Nordheimer himself wrote about these tests in his article on TimesHe continued to say that women entering the labor market are destroying families and creating damaged children. The Bundy also blamed his victims for their deaths at times.
Because his white, middle-class American men make him an American identity and a nationalist figure, we are sure that Bundy could never be twisted because we can easily understand. That is why the Bundy is also infinitely pathological – the diagnosis includes everything from bipolar disorder to psychopathy. Although the psychological elements of his crimes are undeniable, the Bundy was motivated by hatred against women in general.
Continuing to make the Bundi the theme of our movie, song, TV show and podcast, we give the narcissist exactly what he always wanted – attention. And none of them provides any benefit, as most of the media on the Bundi do not provide much to reveal the justification for their crimes as much as it provides more details about the audience's curiosity.
Photographer Henry Hargreav has a series of "No Seconds" in which he denotes the last row of death row prisoners from Timothy McVeigh and Ted Bundy. Hargreaves has said that his favorite is the photo of Victor Feguer's last meal – one olive. "We are thinking about the last meals, and whether it is something that will be complete, and then he has only one olive," said Hargreaves. "You know, it's so simple, beautiful and final. It's like a complete stop at the end of his life." The way Hargreaves speaks of Feguer's last meal is strange romantic. To talk about this kind of tenderness about someone who has been kidnapped and shot, a dead person is alarming. However, it is just one of the countless other artistic renders of the murderers, putting them on exciting pedestals, reinforced by our ever-increasing curiosity.
People who are invited to their passion for Bundi often defend themselves by saying that they are trying to understand the human mind and who could lead one of these terrible crimes. People also advocate talking about serial killers because we believe we will never be able to stop future killers unless we understand them. To put it simply, our society is obsessed with serial killers – especially white, men like Bundy – and we have canonized them as impossible to understand, which allows us to keep the media about them. However, this media does nothing but makes us more.
We have a huge amount of art, writing and other media that were created to feed our appetite for true crime, and yet we continue to talk about such killers as we cannot understand. The Bundy was found guilty of killing more than 30 women and is believed to have killed more than 100. However, most of us cannot name one of the victims of the Ted Bundy. Even those of us who are keenly saying that we do not find Bundy alluring are taking part in his decade of sensitizing his crime and dehumanizing his victims every time we look for more stories.
In its present form, the real crime is a genre that is largely based on the use of details of terrible crimes, especially against marginalized people. It nourishes our interests and gives priority to shock value, giving us the final answers. But we should not look for gory details; we should not try to understand the minds of serial killers as a response to the suspension of future killers. We must try to understand what systems allow their crimes and who gives them mobility. We need to be aware of their upbringing, privileges and social status. We need to identify the causes they supported and what they considered right and actually do something about that. If we continue to talk about serial killers, we need to make a major change as we talk about them.
Follow Shailee Twitter.