The soccer world is divided by the decision to grant the city of Manchester a fine on Wednesday night.
Although Pepe Guardiola's league championship was too good for Shakhtar Donestk, football figures have been polarized with a decision to phase out Raheem Sterling during the European Route.
An international player in England was sentenced to a penalty when he attacked the squadron in the face of Shakhtar defender Mykola Matviyenko's pressure. Although the player did not have a contact, the referee immediately indicated on the spot to give the set.
Sterling has not appealed for a penalty to be revoked, but Guardiola seems to have told the fourth official that this is a wrong decision.
However, the soccer world is divided between the incident – and here is a summary of the response to the sentence.
What the club said
Speaking about BT Sport after the game, Sterling responded to the decision of the penalty.
"I went to the chip ball and I do not know what was going on. I ended up on the floor and turned around," said Sterling.
"I do not think I felt the link, it was just my bad. I fell on the floor and covered it on the floor, sorry for the" Sakter "and apologize."
Guardiola immediately responded to a penalty in response to a fourth official claiming that the decision was wrong. The city manager also took the opportunity to say:
"It's not. VER does not exist in Uefa, so it's a problem. He went to build a chip, dropped, but the judge could make a mistake. But the referee should help the technology.
"It's not attractive to win the second goal and win this way. Last season it happened with us against Liverpool, so the judges should be helped."
Shakter's manager Fonsca played an incident and insisted that the decision did not have a significant difference in the outcome of the match.
There is no point in saying anything about this sentence after such a result, "Fonseca said Futbol 2.
"We lost because the city is a team at another level, much, much better than we do.
"We did not even try to do anything [to win]. My team did not show up well. They do not show courage, and it's all disappointing to me.
"You can recognize six goals, but it's even worse if you're afraid of your opponents.
"Our biggest problem was lack of fear, lack of courage. Therefore, we have not tried to create our game, how we want to do it.
"We still have the opportunity to qualify. We have to win the two remaining games and look forward to the corresponding results in other games, and we have to try to do this, but it will be very difficult to achieve."
View of the judge
Former Premier League spokeswoman Mark Clattenburg said the judge had made a decision and found that the penalty might have stood even if Sterling had protested.
"It would have been an incredible athlete's action if Raheem Sterling, judge Victor Kassi, said he was wrong to have a penalty for Manchester," writes Clattenburg Daily Mail ..
"Even then, that was probably not enough to convince an Hungarian official to change his mind. Judges can stop their decisions until the game returns to work.
"If Sterling were convinced that this was not a penalty, Kassi could buy time and consult with his assistants.
"But if the referee were still convinced that he had accepted the correct call, he could keep his original decision."
What the guy thinks
Sarcasm is an art
Cruel punishment ♂️ ♂️ pic.twitter.com/STKxEjnHMx
& mdash; Gary Lineker (@GaryLineker) November 7, 2018
"I think that city players should just say:" Listen, it's not a penalty, "he said.
"The worst judge," he said.
"This reaction (from Sterling) is excellent.
"How many references do they need to get these rights?"
The supporters are broken up
Sterling should be shy about cheating
& mdash; Andibe (@ andybee36) November 8, 2018
Apparently this is a dive
I can be better than nothing #Sterling with my shoes curved!
& mdash; Red (@ware_lad) November 8, 2018
Not his problem
Raheem Sterling would have been able to tell that he himself behaved correctly? Or they could not follow the punishment of the target. #ManCityShakhtar
& mdash; Willy W AFC (@willywanka) November 8, 2018
Raheem Sterling does not deserve all the sadness of the media as a whole, but he really does not help himself last night – shows a fundamental lack of integrity.
& mdash; Sam Marshall (@ samueljoshua90) November 8, 2018
Looking at this incident, I do not think Sterling drove, but he had a great opportunity to do sports. Yes, it was a ridiculous decision, but players have to make more. honesty in these situations.
& mdash; Tom Hancock (@Tom_Hancock_) November 8, 2018
Even American fans split her
Why Raheem Sterling is blamed, it's not his fault that the judge is indecent. If Ashley Young had moved and told the referee, would it have been a punishment when he attacked Aguero Derby last season? Apparently not. It is not different.
& mdash; Sib (@SibsMUFC) November 7, 2018
Did Willy Boly say ref he broke it back even back in August?
Is it just a cheating when it's Sterling / City? pic.twitter.com/ZKLuWUs8dW
& mdash; Adam Keyworth (@ adamkeyworth) November 8, 2018
I can not wait until the deal makes another terrible decision elsewhere, so everyone offends the defender / attacker that the judge is mistaken for good … yes, wait, that will not happen, because no other player is called Raheem Sterling
& mdash; Aidan (@MCFC_Aidan) November 8, 2018
Not his problem
Blame unnecessary target opponents, referees and penny titles. Three officials could not see that between them, it's not Sterling & # 39; s work to judge the game.
& mdash; Jordan Buckett (@ jordansbuckett) November 8, 2018