Due to the temporary renewal of the US Federal Government, SpaceX was finally able to continue the FCC and FAA filing process required to obtain permissions for future launches, including Falcon Heavy.
One of such applications related to the first launch of Falcon Heavy has revealed quite impressive statistics: it consisted of three first-stage boosters, SpaceX said the Falcon Heavy Center would attempt to land a drone ship. km (600 mi) from its launch site, an easy smashing record for the greatest distance traveled by a Falcon booster during flight.
Of course I still love to place you in a record ~ 965km. It is almost 300 km further that the previous maximum distance of 681km set during the Eutelsat-117WB mission in June 2016. (Unloading was a failure and the amplifier ended up in LOX!) Https://t.co/RECKjMtd37
– SpaceXFleet Updates (@SpaceXFleet) January 28, 2019
The same FCC application also revealed no earlier than (NET) launch date: March 7, 2019. Originally designed for mid and late February, the complexity and logistical challenges associated with two side amplifiers, core kernel creation, delivery, testing and delivery. One of the top stages, and the load from the SpaceX California factory to the Texas testing equipment and the Florida launch platform, which is not surprising, put a small fee on the launching plan. However, if the detection data really happens by March 7, SpaceX will not miss out, given that this Falcon Heavy, based on new and more powerful 5th block amplifiers, could be a significant departure from Unit 2 / Block 3 hardware that is a flight legacy of a triple fastening missile in February 2018.
Only a year after the start of the Falcon Heavy debut, it seems that the second and third launch stages of the missiles were pressed with a significant lack of production capacity. In other words, the SpaceX Hawthorne missile factory just had to focus on the more critical priorities in the 6-9 months that followed the demonstration mission. Almost at the same time as Falcon Heavy was first lifted, the SpaceX world-class production team was located in the first advanced Falcon 9 Block 5 Amplifier (B1046) and packed the final extracts for only 10 days after Heavy's Feb 6 launch debut with a traveler Rocket McGregor, Texas to get the first block of 5 amplifier static fire.
In the meantime, SpaceX's decision deliberately spend otherwise recoverable Falcon amplifiers, after their second launch, meant that the company's fly-by-fly missile fleet was rapidly approaching zero, with a special note from Executive Director Elon Musk to make room for Unit 5, the Falcon family's future (and final form). SpaceX's occupied 2018 launch manifest and several critical missions to the US government were thus balanced in terms of serious Merlin engines, amplifiers and top-end success, reliability and fast production. It included the B1051 – the first clearly rated Falcon 9 – and the B1054, the first SpaceX rocket to be launched to launch high-value US military (especially airborne) satellites. However, SpaceX was needed to produce a Falcon 9 amplifier frame that can be easily reused to support a dozen other commercial launchers.
Falcon 9 B1046 is processed in the LA Port shortly after the third successful launch and landing in December 2018 (Pauline Acalin)
The Falcon 9 B1047 is depicted below the top section and satellite I & # 39; hail-2 before its second launch. (Tom Cross)
Falcon 9 B1048 returned to the port of Los Angeles by drone ship. July 27 (Pauline Acalin)
Falcon 9 B1049 returned to Los Angeles port after a second successful launch and landing in four months. (Pauline Acalin)
The Falcon 9 B1050 is visible right after lifting. The GPS III SV01 is a Falcon 9 with no grid fins or no landing. ☹ (Tom Cross)
Falcon 9 B1051 and Crew Dragon Vertically at Pad 39A. (SpaceX)
Falcon 9 B1054 – Hides grid fins or descent legs – first and last lifted to support USF's first launch of GPS III satellite. (SpaceX)
This gambling ended up paying off, and Unit 5 worked well and supported a reasonable – if not a record – reuse rate. SpaceX successfully launched B1054 for USF, completed B1051 (now Pad 39A, waiting for NASA ahead), and created enough reusable block 5 amplifier to support nine additional commercial missions in 2018. Forgetting to deny the assumption of a truly miraculous and unprecedented production of Falcon amplifiers, the next launch of Falcon Heavy was almost guaranteed no less than 6-12 months after the rocket launch debut – SpaceX's entire launch business depended on 5+ unrelated Falcon 9 boosters, while Falcon Heavy Customers in Arabsat and USAF were unlikely to start in flight-proven hardware to begin Unit 5 career.
– TomCross (@_TomCross_) October 6, 2018
All cylinders burn
When Falcon 9 B1054 left the SpaceX Hawthorne factory (see above) in early October, it seems that the company's production team directly changed the integration and delivery of the next three (or more) Falcon Heavy amplifiers back to the second and third start. The first new side booster diverted the plant in mid-November, followed by a second side booster at the beginning of December and (probably but very likely) the core of the center at the end of 2019. t now in SpaceX Florida's premises, while the center core has just completed Texas static fire testing, or is already on its way to the east.
One of the two Falcon Heavy side amplifiers was placed vertically in SpaceX McGregor equipment during static fire testing. (Teslarati / Aero photo)
The second (and third) Falcon Heavy flight is even closer to reality than a new headboard amplifier to Florida after static fire tests are completed in Texas. (Reddit / u / e32revelry)
Joshua Murrah, a member of the SpaceX Facebook group, seized the second Falcon Heavy side amplifier that arrived in Florida last month. (Joshua Murrah, 01/17/19)
The next Falcon Heavy first side amplifier delivered several viewers around December 21st (Instagram)
The pressure amplifier – possibly the next center of the Falcon Heavy center – was a vertical McGregor S1 static fire bench. (Instagram / u / tcryguy)
Booster – Falcon Heavy Next Center or New Falcon 9 – Was Vertical in SpaceX McGregor, TX Test Room on January 28 (Instagram / u / n75sd)
The recent SpaceX document chart offers an idea of how Falcon Heavy Block 5 will look (SpaceX)
After the kernel and upper leg travel to the SpaceX Kennedy Space Center Pad 39A, the company's technicians and engineers will be able to integrate the second Falcon Heavy that has ever been in preparation for a critical static fire test. This could happen already in February, though Crew Dragon (DM-1) – now NET Make from Pad 39A, after a cruel string of strings – the launch debut is likely to be overwhelmingly over Falcon Heavy and could thus directly interfere with its launch as a launch pad and conveyor / Ejector (T / E) must be checked for at least a few days to switch between Falcon 9 and Heavy.
Nevertheless, the next two Falcon Heavy discoveries will be worth the wait. SpaceX FCC submissions indicate that the center core can travel nearly 1,000 km (600 mi) east of Pad 39A to unload drone vessel OCISLY at startup, smashing during a previous record attempt – June 2016 Eutelsat 117WB startup – ~ 700 km ( 430 mi). The fact that the Falcon 9 amplifier, although less powerful in Unit 2, failed in the unloading attempt and was no longer an oxidant seconds before landing. The core of the Falcon Heavy debut center also took place during the unloading of completely different but not fatal anomalies, causing almost half of the speed of sound (300 mph / 480 km / h) to pass by the noise ship and slam in the Atlantic.
It seems that the early leakage of liquid oxygen caused the engine to shut down just above the deck pic.twitter.com/Sa6uCkpknY
– Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 17, 2016
Orbiter, a user of the NASASpaceflight forum, known for its rocket performance rating, first pointed to the impressive distance from the mapping coordinates included in SpaceX's January 28 FCC submission, and estimated that the Falcon Heavy center booster, as it was supposed to travel as soon as ~ 3.5 km / s (2.2 mi / s) at the main engine shut-off (MECO) – the point where the booster detaches from the top section and cover. It would be an almost unprecedented speed for any Falcon amplifier, not to mention an amplifier with plans to unload after launch. Falcon 9 MECO typically recovers at speeds of 1.5 to 2.5 km / s, but even during the recent launch of the GPS III, the F9 S1 engines were shut down at about 2.7 km / s.
Regardless of whether the MECO speed calculation is correct, the launch of the Falcon Heavy NET March 6,000 kg (13,300 lb) Arabsat 6A satellite is likely to be an extremely hot rebirth and recovery of the center kernel, but the missile duo from the side amplifiers will try to repeat the impressive debut mission. double landing LZ-1.
Check out Teslarat's newsletters that provide quick updates, on-the-spot prospects, and unique SpaceX rocket launch and recovery processes!