The decision not to reveal the election of Buenos Aires to reorganize into Cambiemi. The head of government, Horacio Rodríguez Larreta, who was already ready to join the Buenos Aires elections, will make it known for a few more weeks. Confirmation will take place in February. The most important cornerstone was the radical leaders Alfredo Cornejo (Mendoza) and Gerardo Morales (Jujuy), who remained on hold after Maurice Macri's request to unite until the dispute with María Eugenia Vidal was resolved. Now, before the President's renewed pressure, co-regionalists give a long time and say that they will fix this issue in March. And they complain that there is no internal debate to determine the merger of the province of Buenos Aires.
Macri's appearance in the unified strategy for all government pre-election elections has so far been introduced by Vidal. With his decision to abandon any plan other than that set by President and Chief of Staff, Marcos Peña, Vidal was able to drive from this place and allowed him to negotiate funds he had requested for the nation. Now, Macri's appearance is fixed to the other three provincial governors who are in Cambiemi and who have not yet come.
The first is Larrett, who from the beginning suggests that he would join the election in Buenos Aires, which deprived the country of pressure. However, the head of government has not yet defined. In their environment, they said they were "close" to making a decision. First, he will take a vacation in Brazil to think about things. In any case, close to the head of government clearly stated that the decision will not reach March. Last year, Larrett managed to change the law of Buenos Aires, which prevented him from joining his date. Without resistance, it does not get so much pressure.
There are no radical cases which, from the outset, oppose the unifying strategy. When Makri received Cornejo and Morales in Cumelén during their holiday, he told them that they should both be reunited. Both had to think about it and asked him to discuss the division of Buenos Aires first. Now, with the single province of Buenos Aires, they stopped this argument. The way it was solved left a little debate for religiousists.
No one has any reason to unite. Morales believes he is convinced of winning the opponents, but he has an alliance with a rejuvenating front. Currently, he opposed Macri that Jujuy re-elected such a large investment in the state register. And he says that a convincing victory in the middle of the year will be beneficial to the president: the same argument Vidal tried and did. Morales spoke with the Clarín newspaper to indicate that he was surprised at how the dispute with Vidal was resolved: "I was surprised that it was agreed that it was set in March. We are adapting to Cambio's national strategy," he said. said.
In the case of Mendoza, Cornejo cannot be re-elected and tries to force his dolphin Martin Kerchner. The governor of Mendoza is being crushed by the radical efforts of this province, who claim to have local polls to go with Macri. In short, the radicals still see Macri as a stone backpack in local elections. Currently, they define the definition forward: by March they say nothing about election dates.
Meanwhile, Deputy Governor of Buenos Aires, Daniel Salvador, said that Vidal's decision was "the best in the province and in Buenos Aires".
"At the national level, at the provincial level and at the municipal level, there is the same project when the analysis is done from this political space, we are confident of the task we have accomplished," said Salvador.
In turn, head of the Buenos Aires cabinet, Federico Salvai, who, together with the political wing of the government, had contributed to the division, said yesterday that Vidal decided to "think of the population of Buenos Aires, not to prolong the number of days they need to vote. I also did not want it to be speculative .
However, the Vidal official clearly stated that the division "was an opportunity to discuss what the government has been proposing for years, and that is to change the voting tool to end these savannah lists." "Electronic voting is enabled in the province, there is one vote against one paper vote and thus voting is improved. But this time it was thought to have a simpler calendar and cost issue," he said.